🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the Britain, and it feels like it’s time for a re-evaluation. Over the years, an celebration that started out as a commemorative event of heritage, traditions and links between international African diaspora communities, has taken on a commercial tone, expanding to include events where Black people are paid to talk to Caucasian groups about “unconscious bias” and supportive partnership. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade created a surge in the business of displaying cultural sensitivity. However, that period has concluded. The tide has reached its height, producing a diluted aftermath of what increasing understanding is for.

The Background of Black History Observance

First commemorated in the US and Canada, Black History Month was established in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with a week of commemoration and observance in the second week of February. Black History Month developed from this initiative and was publicly established in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the United States and Canada in winter, but also in autumn in the UK, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Ireland and the Netherlands.

The observance has developed since those days, giving reduced attention to the histories of colonial slavery and fights for racial justice, and more on influential individuals of color in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and widely honoring the input Black people have made to shape the country. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with lectures and artistic activities. But the manner the month is observed is a indication of the current political situation. How it progresses is a instructive case in how assimilation leads to dismantling: the transformation of Black History Month has stymied the purpose of it, which is to confront embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Troubling Time

Few things illustrate how crucial it is to rethink Black History Month more than the current time in which it occurs this year. In the United Kingdom, a revitalized conservative movement in the shape of the Reform organization is ahead in surveys. In the recent season we saw the largest far-right rally in the history of Britain. the Conservative leader, the person of color at the helm of the Conservative party, is a strong critic of anti-racism activism, and we are in a place where a legislator feels empowered to say that the absence of Caucasian individuals in specific city neighborhoods is a cause for alarm. Meanwhile, extreme conservative groups are growing in the EU as a complete entity.

In the United States, a massive attack against DEI and affirmative action has been carried, frequently with success, to the highest courts of the country. A drive to remove Black history and legacy from the records is under way. One of Donald Trump's first executive orders targeted the museum of African American legacy, and the renowned cultural organization, alleging that they of a “concerted and widespread effort to alter the country's historical narrative” by depicting the United States “as naturally discriminatory”.

Given these circumstances, the celebration represents how little it can be effective if it is confined to either dutiful corporate observances, or politically neutered festivities of historical achievements, rather than challenging the conditions of the present. It also demonstrates how its short period means that it is disconnected from the wider consistent effort that is necessary. A university professor, a educator at a learning establishment, articulated it most accurately when she raised concerns about the short-term symbolic gestures of the observance. “The difficulty with embracing a superficial method”, she wrote, “is that it often means that Black History Month becomes a fleeting performance rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Figuring out how to alter, change and broaden initiatives for equal rights and acknowledgment in such moments of dejection and worry is a difficult task. There is a temptation to just eliminate observances such as Black History Month altogether, thinking they are no longer suitable, or are relics of an period that has not worked.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and tradition of campaigns for equality – community-based BLM initiatives, inclusion and equity efforts, and certainly, even commercial engagements – form an framework that a significant effort has been invested in. It is there not just to decay as the politics moves on (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month look like? Well, first, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is spread out throughout the annual calendar (as some institutions are already starting to implement), sections of its curriculum (particularly around prominent figures of color) integrated into school curriculums. It would also be a time that does not shy away from governmental matters, and provides room for people, particularly the younger generation, to share their anxieties and narratives. What use is simple recognition of the bygone era when it fails to address the contemporary truth of far-right rallies in the street? Organizations who mark it should not be reassured with the non-confrontational words of hidden discrimination and awareness of “microaggressions”, but challenged by the dangers that affect everyone if fight against prejudice is not treated with importance. To summarize, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, urgent, and responsive. It could be that an complete renaming is in order – Contemporary Black History Month.